Illinois Burglary

The Law – 720 ILCS 5/19-1

A person commits burglary when without authority, the person knowingly enters or remains within a building, housetrailer, watercraft, aircraft, motor vehicle, railroad car, or any part thereof, with intent to commit therein a felony or theft. (This offense shall not apply to those offenses set forth in Section 4-102 of the Illinois Vehicle Code.)

Burglary involves going into a building or other structure/conveyance listed – while no people are present at any point. That is the distinction between burglary and robbery. Here, with burglary, the major issue usually surrounds whether the person charged was present “with the intent to commit a felony or theft”. The State must prove this beyond a reasonable doubt. There are many factors which go to show this intent, and also many factors which go to show that the person’s intent was NOT to commit a felony or theft. Each case is different and the facts of each case are different. Of course, the State has the burden of proving every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Sentence

CLASS 2 FELONY – 3-7 years prison

Probation Possible? – Yes

CLASS 1 FELONY – 4-15 YEARS, IF --- the BURGLARY IS committed in a school, day care center, day care home, or part day child care facility, or place of worship (UNLESS THE DAY CARE CENTER , day care home, or part day child care facility WAS OPERATED IN A PRIVATE RESIDENCE USED AS A DWELLING).

Probation Possible – Yes.

Success Story: We successfully defended a client charged with burglary by showing and arguing that the State had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that our client’s intent in entering a building was for the purpose of committing a felony or theft. Our client had refused to give a statement to the police when he was apprehended in a building (as was his absolute right under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution), he had no burglary tools with him, had nothing else in his possession that would substantiate the State’s argument that he had to have been there to do something illegal. It is not enough for the State to just argue that a person HAD TO have been there for an illicit purpose, the State must PROVE that the person intended to commit a felony or theft. Our client was found “not guilty” after trial.

The latest from our blog...

How Will Uninsured Motorist Coverage Protect You?

Getting involved in a car accident is a very scary event, especially if you or a loved one was hurt. If the other driver did not have auto insurance coverage ...

Read more...

The Dangers of Black Ice

This month, the weather has been in the sub-zero degrees and driving conditions have been under par. The weather may get warmer, but we should not get too excited. As ...

Read more...

How to Avoid a Potential Medical Malpractice Case

Being affected by a medical malpractice case does not only affect you; the misdiagnosis negatively affects the doctor and his or her medical career. Every year, medical malpractice has killed over ...

Read more...

Successful Cases

More Settlements

James A. Payonk, Jr.

~ Attorney at Law ~

10705 W 159th St.
Orland Park, Illinois 60467

(708) 633-6005